← BioTransfer GEO Dataset Finder
GEO series

Chromatin-dependent motif syntax defines differentiation trajectories [ChIP-seq]

GSE272524 Mus musculus Genome binding/occupancy profiling by high throughput sequencing 76 samples Submitted 2025/08/07 Platform GPL17021Platform GPL24247Platform GPL19057
Summary
Transcription factors (TFs) recognizing DNA motifs within regulatory regions drive cell identity. Despite recent advances, their specificity remains incompletely understood. Here, we address this by contrasting two TFs, Neurogenin-2 (NGN2) and MyoD1, which recognize ubiquitous E-box motifs yet drive distinct cell fates toward neurons and muscles, respectively. Upon induction in mouse embryonic stem cells, we monitor binding across differentiation, employing an interpretable machine learning approach that integrates preexisting DNA accessibility. This reveals a chromatin-dependent motif syntax, delineating both common and factor-specific binding, validated by cellular and in vitro assays. Shared binding sites reside in open chromatin, locally influenced by nucleosomes. In contrast, factor-specific binding in closed chromatin involves NGN2 and MyoD1 acting as pioneer factors, influenced by motif variant frequencies, motif spacing, and interaction partners, which together account for subsequent lineage divergence. Transferring our methodology to other models demonstrates how a combination of opportunistic binding and context-specific chromatin-opening underpin TF specificity, driving differentiation trajectories.
Published in
Chromatin-dependent motif syntax defines differentiation trajectories
Durdu S, Iskar M, Isbel L et al. · Molecular cell 2025 · PMID 40780181 · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2025.07.005
This dataset
Download

Direct links to NCBI, no account and no request form: the whole study as GSE272524_RAW.tar, processed values as the series matrix, the supplementary file directory, and per-sample supplementary files for any of the 76 samples. Raw sequencing reads are also available from ENA.

Also filed as BioProject PRJNA1137298 and SRA study SRP520744. Searching any of these in the dataset finder brings you back here.

Study design
6 conditions, mostly in triplicate
ChIPseq_GFP_6h ×6 ChIPseq_NGN2_6h ×3 ChIPseq_NGN2mut_6h ×3 ChIPseq_input_NGN2_6h ×3 ChIPseq_MYOD1_6h ×3 ChIPseq_GFP_24h ×2 ChIPseq_NGN2_ES6h ×1 ChIPseq_input_NGN2_ES6h ×1 +18 more

Supports a between-group comparison across 20 samples.

6 replicated groups read from the first 40 of 76 sample titles; they account for 20 of them. Check it against the sample list below before relying on it.

Samples in this study

+ 36 more — browse all 76 samples with per-sample file links →

Similar datasets

Search all mouse ChIP / ATAC / CUT&Tag datasets in GEO →

Share this dataset

Metadata from NCBI GEO, cached and refreshed periodically — the NCBI page above is authoritative. Downloads link straight to NCBI/ENA; nothing is proxied through BioTransfer.